| American Advantage Mortgage, Inc. |
FAQs | Contact | Feedback |
|
Site Menu... |
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking July 1995 The most common index probably is the one-year constant maturity Treasury, which closely tracks the average quoted auction yields for Treasuries. The constant maturities are based on Treasury's daily yield curve, which relates the yield on a security to its maturity and is based on closing market bid yields on actively traded Treasuries in the OTC market. The yields are calculated from composite quotations reported by five leading government securities dealers. The constant yield values are taken from the yield curve at fixed maturities, allowing yield estimations for a given maturity even though no security outstanding has exactly that maturity. The COF indexes are calculated and may be either an average or a median figure, although an average is usually used. Of all of these, the 11th District COF appears to be popular now because it seems to be doing what the COF indexes were designed to do-- maintain a profitable spread between the cost of lending and the yield from borrowing. It represents the monthly average cost of borrowings reported by members of the Federal Home Loan Bank System in the economically thriving 11th District, which includes California, Nevada and Arizona. But not all COF indexes perform the same because the allocation of liabilities among different FHLB districts is not the same. For example, in one district member institutions may make greater use of lower cost FHLB advances, which causes the index to be lower. Others may be in areas of intense competition that forces them to pay higher rates for deposits, which, in turn, makes the COF index go up. To level out these differences, there is a national COF based on the median COF figures reported by all Board Districts. COFs, however, are lagging indexes. They consist of weighted averages of S&L borrowings that may not closely reflect current market rates. And the index is computed based on the previous months financial information, which is not actually applied to the mortgage rate note until a month after it is released. So in effect the COF index is three months behind, even assuming the average cost of liabilities reflects market rates. Under market conditions, Treasury indexes are more responsive, hence more volatile, than COF indexes. When rates are rising, the lagging nature of the COF indexes tend to lower investor returns because the investor cannot take full advantage of market rates. On the other hand, when rates are falling, the lagging works to the investors advantage. The LIBOR index is the rate that the most creditworthy international banks charge each other for loans. A LIBOR-indexed ARM has yet to gain wide acceptance in the U.S. perhaps because of consumer unfamiliarity with the concept. From a lenders perspective, a LIBOR index offers the opportunity to tap capital sources in foreign markets where the LIBOR is fully understood and appreciated as a market-responsive index. So which is better-an index geared to Treasuries, cost-of-funds, or the LIBOR? It all depends on the investors objective and comfort level. A word of caution, though, is in order for investors looking to COF indexed ARMs, chiefly because of troubled thrifts. If those thrifts begin to sharply increase their level of GHLB advances, it is expected that the COF would be lower and the yield less. Indexes must be weighed, too, against an ARMs other features: initial interest rates, payment caps, interest rate caps, lifetime caps, adjustment frequencies, Margins, and whether negative amortization occurs. All these factors must be considered by mortgage lenders and the secondary market agencies in structuring an ARM product acceptable to consumers and valued highly in the marketplace by investors. ________________________________________________________________________ THE KIPLINGER WASHINGTON LETTER Circulated weekly to business clients since 1923 Vol. 71. No. 27 The KIPLINGER Washington Editors 1729 H St., Washington, DC 20006-3938 Dear Client: Washington, July 8, 1994
|
||
AAMI © 2006 | All Rights Reserved Any
reproduction or editing by any means mechanical or electronic without the
express written permission of the copyright holder is strictly prohibited.
Home | FAQs | Contact | Privacy Policy | Feedback |
||